![]() |
| A Mycobacterium species similar to the organism responsible for Bovine TB |
Badger's carry Bovine TB without it causing them any harm - however if they come into contact with cattle then this can cause them to transmit the disease to a herd. This can then give rise to diseased animals and end up an economic loss to the farmer.
Badgers and TB are like Chickens and Salmonella. Salmonella won't make the chickens ill, however if we were to come in contact with a chicken (dead or alive) and not wash our hands then we'd probably end up with Salmonella poisoning.
![]() |
| http://www.imperial.ac.uk/ |
Also earlier this month Imperial College London said that new analysis confirmed that a 'badger cull' may increase the risk of bovine TB to nearby herds. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_13-7-2011-9-59-29
So for or against the Badger cull? I feel it won't stop the spread of Bovine TB (and with the information above probably increase it!). It may reduce it but a vaccine for badgers or cattle would be a better option and would keep the badger loving people happy
Thanks for reading :)


In Australia there is currently a debate as to whether we should cull protected fruit bat population which are an asymptomatic reservoir for Hendra virus wish can jump into horses and cause disease and then into humans (only rarely). This is despite the development of a horse vaccine for Hendra... The bloodlust of some people is astounding.
ReplyDeleteI agree - people should think before they decide that an 'animal cull' is the best way to deal with disease. However it was later said on the news that there is now no plan to cull badgers, this year at least, in England!
ReplyDeleteSimilar blog on 21stfloor covering this too - evidence doesn't quite stack up for a badger cull. Prob politicians pandering to farmers.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thetwentyfirstfloor.com/?p=2515